18/05/2009 19:26 Filed in:
Mumblings
| Musings
O.K. to be honest I was very annoyed with Google
for blocking my site - it has been blocked for over
six weeks now.
I felt discriminated.
This site was hacked on the afternoon of March 27th
and within hours, Google hung up a sign to inform
my readers that I was distributing malware. In
actual fact each of my .html pages had been
injected with a Java script which could attack
Windows machines.
I took a careful look at my site (because Google
told me I should) and discovered hundreds of pages
which had been hacked and needed replacing. I did
so within three hours of the attack.
Sadly I missed a couple of galleries, I'm afraid.
The problem is, it is impossible to communicate
with Google. You send a request for them to rescan
a site and get a message that it can take up to
several weeks to do so ...
... but you never get an answer or a message to
tell you that your site is or (in my case) still
isn't o.k.
Then I found a scan result which stated that my
site had been scanned last Wednesday and ...
... was distributing malware.
I opened up each and every single page that is
openly online and checked.
Nothing.
Then I remembered some galleries that are linked to
this blog - dormant and unused.
I checked them. They were a writhing mass of bugs!
I spent Thursday evening online checking each and
every hidden directory and repaired over a hundred
files.
If you feel that your computer has been compromised
as a result of visiting my site, I would like offer
my humble apologies.
I reacted as soon as I was notified but missed the
galleries containing the pictures of the car
cemetery, the cows under the trees and a few pages
that are, as to date, still unlinked.
If you visited either the cars or the cows between
27th March and 14th May, then please check your
(Windows – Macs remain unaffected) computer
for malware.
I now have certification that my site is clean
again!
17/05/2009 16:15 Filed in:
Round and About
... |
Photography
Towers & Bay-Windows ...
St.Gallen is an interesting city.
A city of small towers and bay windows.
At the moment, it would seem, it is one big
building-site too.
It is still, however, very photogenic.
The best time to take photographs is a Sunday
morning between 09:00 and 10:00.
At this time of day the streets are freshly freed
of the nights debris (groups of youngsters sit
around at night drinking and smashing their empties
– the cleaning troops arrive at around
05:00). The citizens of St.Gallen are listening to
the sermon inside the cathedral.
You have the streets to yourself.
So here's the second picture, taken with the new
lens ...
... not
quite in focus, I'm afraid –
still working on that!
To see the larger version, you will need to have
QuickTime installed.
You will also need a little patience, it is quite
large.
Why is it the second picture?
Because the first was taken in St.Gallen –
here it is:
Focal length: 12 mm;
Apperture: 8; Exposure: 250
There is no larger version of this one online yet,
but I'm sure a new gallery will be published soon
...
09/05/2009 13:05 Filed in:
Mumblings
On the phone ...
Me: I would like some clarification regarding
duties paid on parcel number 'xyz'.
Her: Yes, Sir, how may I help?
Me: I would like to know why I had to pay CHF 99
duties for a used article.
Her: You didn't Sir. That was CHF 65 duties; CHF 18
fees; CHF 10 Storage and
CHF 6 because the parcel had to be opened.
Me: But I never had to pay duties on a used article
before!
Her: In that case, Sir, you must have ticked the
wrong boxes.
Me: Which boxes?!
Her: Of the customs declaration on the parcel.
Me: Come again – How can I tick boxes on a
parcel I haven't received yet?
Her: In that case, the person who sent the parcel
made the mistake.
Me: I would like to apply for the return of duties
and fees.
Her: The fees can't be returned; you may apply to
have the duties returned
but it will cost you CHF 30 in fees.
Me: O.K. Nice joke. Can you set the ball rolling
for me?
Her: I'm not joking, you have to pay CHF 30, that
leaves you with CHF 35.
You have to apply yourself.
Me: I am myself.
Her: You have to make a written application and
return all of the papers.
Me: Look – you have everything you need on
your screen at this very moment.
Would you please be kind enough to push the button
marked reimburse for me.
Her: I don't have that button, you have to make a
written application and
return all of the papers.
Me: But this is ridiculous.
Her: You have to make a written application and
return all of the papers.
Me: But ...
Her: You have to make a written application and
return all of the papers.
Me: Have you ever heard of rendition of services?
Her: You have to make a written application and
return all of the papers.
Oops - I broke the phone, banging it on my desk!
09/05/2009 11:57 Filed in:
Appenzeller
| Musings
For four years now, my apprentice has been training
to be a Typograph/Media-Producer.
This week she had to take her practical
examination.
It is interesting that in Germany they sent the
exams along to the instructor with the request to
make sure they were carried out correctly. In
Switzerland, an 'expert' comes along to supervise.
The lady responsible for supervising our
examinations first explained the exercises that
were to be carried out and, when she was sure the
instructions were clear, she pressed the button on
her stop-watch.
She was a little put out that she couldn't sit next
to the examinee, but the poor girl was nervous
enough, without having a stranger breathing down
her neck for two-and-a-half days.
Instead I seated our expert in the office opposite
where she could see who went in and out, but
couldn't actually see the apprentice without taking
a few steps first. I certainly wasn't making life
easy for her.
I gave her a coffee and watched her twiddle her
thumbs and flip through her diary for a few minutes
before I settled down to watch my protégé's screen
from the comfort of my own computer, sending her
the odd tip via chat now and again ...
You don't want someone to ruin four years hard
work, just because they are nervous.
The Pre-Press exam is fairly straight-forward
— unless, of course, you are a bundle of
nerves:
• Colour-correction and exact cropping of
three digital images; a picture composition put
together from two images and a cut-out with some
retouching work – 2 hours.
• Reproduction of a two-sided order-card to
exact design 'drawings' – 4 hours.
• Design and production of a sixteen-page
brochure, from initial scribbles (to be submitted)
to finished print-data and presentation mock-up
– 12 hours.
• Correct colour-profiles embedded in all
files and everything saved to a CD after a specific
file-structure.
After 19 hours points are deducted every 15 minutes
taken, after 20 hours the exercise is broken off.
Failure.
Every now and then, a colleague would distract the
expert while a few tips were given or corrections
suggested and during the midday break everything
was checked and double checked. Another colleague
made sure that the meal was drawn out a little ...
I heard of one young lady, who returned to her desk
on Thursday evening after 'her' expert had left and
spent half the night correcting and completing her
work. We didn't have to resort to such drastic
measures, we just spent a lot of time coaching and
becalming ...
The mock-up presented a few problems because it had
to be larger than A3 [420 mm x 297 mm]. The
examination committee presumes that
everybody has an A2 printer that wil
print, bind and trim all in one go. Our A3 printer
doesn't and is too small anyway!
I asked the expert to turn a blind-eye, while I
helped produce the mock-up.
She did.
I got the thumbs up yesterday when I asked for the
experts opinion on the results (I knew so anyway,
but I wanted my protégé to see it).
Now we have to endure two days of theoretical
exams. We can't help there, I'm afraid, those have
to be taken at school ...
02/05/2009 13:35 Filed in:
Appenzeller
| Mumblings
I'm sure you've read numerous reports about [lack
of] Swiss hospitality and Customer Service and I'm
sure you can remember that some sort of football
championships were held here last year.
I told you what the results would be ...
... no, not the football results, but the result
that Swiss courtesy would have on tourism –
bookings have dropped by twenty percent.
Can that be coincidence?
Yesterday I asked a computer-supermarket-assistant
where I might find a USB adapter set.
She shrugged her shoulders and told me she had no
idea. Did she call a colleague and ask for help?
No.
I found what I wanted in the end after walking up
and down endless rows of computer accessories.
This is just typical of what to expect when you
visit Switzerland. Not just in shops but in hotels
and restaurants too.
And does it end there?
I ordered three tubes of toothpaste in England.
They were sent to me via Royal Mail and cost £14
including postage.
A week later a bill arrived from Swiss cutoms
– CHF 60, an equivalent of £35!
I immediately phoned to complain and was informed
that customs taxes are calculated by the size of
the parcel.
I mentioned the fact that I had a receipt for CHF
20 which already included astronomically high VAT
and was informed, in not so many words, that that
was my bad luck!
I ordered a screw in the USA. Because it was custom
made, it cost $60. Postage also came to $60.
Customs taxes? $60!
$120 for a single (albeit specialised) screw.
I am agog to know the result of my latest strife
with Swiss customs.
Three weeks ago I bought a camera lens in an
auction on ebay.
After a week, I contacted the guy I purchased from
to ask if he'd actually posted the thing off. He
assured me he'd sent it off with Royal Mail the
same day.
I phoned Swiss Postal services - sorry, without a
tracking number, we can't trace a parcel.
Last week I phoned again. No results.
The day before yesterday a letter flattered through
my letter box. Swiss Post Customs Services.
A notice that they have a parcel for me which has
been declared correctly to be a camera lens.
So my parcel has been sitting on a shelf in Zürich
while someone has been trying to decide how to tax
it. Due to the size of the parcel, it will probably
cost me what – CHF 40? But on the customs
label it states camera lens – surely a lens
is worth a lot of money?
The letter invited me to state honestly (they are
kidding, surely) the value of the contents and to
provide proof in form of a receipt.
If I am unable to provide proof within five days,
the parcel will be returned to sender.
I posted off the PayPal receipt the same day
underlining the words 'USED LENS'.
I wonder how long I shall have to wait, when I
might receive my parcel and which costs might be
added for the unexpected act of actually having to
handle a parcel.
Keep this up you wonderful Swiss and you won't just
be losing tourists, you'll be losing tax-payers too
...